Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 597
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Med ; 13(10): e7027, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38770622

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Black men and men with end-stage kidney disease have lower rates of treatment and higher mortality for prostate cancer. We studied the interaction of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with Black race for treatment rates and mortality for men with prostate cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 516 Black and 551 White men with ESKD before prostate cancer 22,299 Black men, and 141,821 White men without ESKD who were 40 years or older from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results-Medicare data (2004-2016). All Black men with or without ESKD and White men with ESKD had higher prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis than White men without ESKD. Black men with ESKD had the lowest rates for treatment in both local and advanced stages of prostate cancer (age-adjusted risk ratio: 0.76, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.71-0.82 for local stage and age-adjusted risk ratio: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76-0.9 for advanced stages) compared to White men without ESKD. Compared to White men without ESKD, prostate cancer-specific mortality was higher in White men with ESKD for both local and advanced stages (age-adjusted hazard ratio: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-2.8 and HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2-2.2) and it was higher for ESKD Black men only in advanced stage prostate cancer (age-adjusted hazard ratio: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.5-3.6). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that having a comorbidity such as ESKD makes Black men more vulnerable to racial disparities in prostate cancer treatment and mortality.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica , Neoplasias da Próstata , Programa de SEER , População Branca , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Idoso , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(9): e029691, 2024 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700013

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in patients with kidney failure, and their risk of cardiovascular events is 10 to 20 times higher as compared with the general population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 508 822 patients who initiated dialysis between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2014 using the United States Renal Data System with linked Medicare claims. We determined hospitalization rates for cardiovascular events, defined by acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, and stroke. We examined the association of sex with outcome of cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death using adjusted time-to-event models. The mean age was 70±12 years and 44.7% were women. The cardiovascular event rate was 232 per thousand person-years (95% CI, 231-233), with a higher rate in women than in men (248 per thousand person-years [95% CI, 247-250] versus 219 per thousand person-years [95% CI, 217-220]). Women had a 14% higher risk of cardiovascular events than men (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.13-1.16]). Women had a 16% higher risk of heart failure (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.15-1.18]), a 31% higher risk of stroke (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.28-1.34]), and no difference in risk of acute coronary syndrome (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.99-1.03]). Women had a lower risk of cardiovascular death (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.88-0.90]) and a lower risk of all-cause death than men (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.95-0.97]). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing dialysis, women have a higher risk of cardiovascular events of heart failure and stroke than men. Women have a lower adjusted risk of cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Causas de Morte , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Diálise Renal , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Medição de Risco/métodos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/complicações , Insuficiência Renal/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal/mortalidade
3.
Kidney360 ; 3(5): 891-899, 2022 05 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36128479

RESUMO

Background: Geographic and neighborhood-level factors, such as poverty and education, have been associated with an increased risk for incident ESKD, likelihood of receiving pre-ESKD care, and likelihood of receiving a transplant. However, few studies have examined whether these same factors are associated with ESKD mortality. In this study, we examined county-level variation in ESKD mortality and identified county-level characteristics associated with this variation. Methods: We identified 1,515,986 individuals (aged 18-84 years) initiating RRT (dialysis or transplant) between 2010 and 2018 using the United States Renal Data System. Among 2781 counties, we estimated county-level, all-cause, age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) among patients with ESKD. We then identified county-level demographic (e.g., percent female), socioeconomic (e.g., percent unemployed), healthcare (e.g., percent without health insurance), and health behavior (e.g., percent current smokers) characteristics associated with ASMR using multivariable hierarchic linear mixed models and quantified the percentage of ASMR variation explained by county-level characteristics. Results: County-level ESKD ASMR ranged from 45 to 1022 per 1000 person-years (PY) (mean, 119 per 1000 PY). ASMRs were highest in counties located in the Tennessee Valley and Appalachia regions, and lowest in counties located in New England, the Pacific Northwest, and Southern California. In fully adjusted models, county-level characteristics significantly associated with higher ESKD mortality included a lower percentage of Black residents (-4.94 per 1000 PY), lower transplant rate (-4.08 per 1000 PY), and higher healthcare expenditures (5.21 per 1000 PY). Overall, county-level characteristics explained 19% of variation in ESKD mortality. Conclusions: Counties with high ESKD-related mortality may benefit from targeted and multilevel interventions that combine knowledge from a growing evidence base on the interplay between individual and community-level factors associated with ESKD mortality.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica , Pobreza , Diálise Renal , Região dos Apalaches , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Características de Residência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 22602, 2021 11 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34799610

RESUMO

There is little comprehensive education for people with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) progress. We investigated the differences in terms of outcomes between patients with CKD stages 3-5 who enrolled and did not enroll in the pre-ESRD care education in Taiwan. This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). All patients diagnosed with CKD stages 3-5 who received the pre-ESRD care education through the pay for performance (P4P) program were enrolled. Based on whether or not they participated in the program, they were categorized into P4P or non-P4P groups. All analyses were performed from January 2006 through December 2015. Study outcomes were risk of hemodialysis dependency, hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. In this study of 29,337 patients, those with CKD stages 3-5 in the P4P group had lower events of hemodialysis, hospitalization, and all-cause mortality compared to patients in the non-P4P group. This study suggested that pre-ESRD care education is associated with increased patient outcomes, resulting in lower hemodialysis and hospitalization events and a higher overall survival rate in patients with CKD stages 3-5. Patient education could raise opportunities to improve pre-ESRD care by reaching patients outside the traditional health care setting.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Reembolso de Incentivo , Diálise Renal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 16(10): 1522-1530, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34620648

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Medicare plans to extend financial structures tested through the Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care (CEC) Initiative-an alternative payment model for maintenance dialysis providers-to promote high-value care for beneficiaries with kidney failure. The End-Stage Renal Disease Seamless Care Organizations (ESCOs) that formed under the CEC Initiative varied greatly in their ability to generate cost savings and improve patient health outcomes. This study examined whether organizational or community characteristics were associated with ESCOs' performance. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We used a retrospective pooled cross-sectional analysis of all 37 ESCOs participating in the CEC Initiative during 2015-2018 (n=87 ESCO-years). Key exposures included ESCO characteristics: number of dialysis facilities, number and types of physicians, and years of CEC Initiative experience. Outcomes of interest included were above versus below median gross financial savings (2.4%) and standardized mortality ratio (0.93). We analyzed unadjusted differences between high- and low-performing ESCOs and then used multivariable logistic regression to construct average marginal effect estimates for parameters of interest. RESULTS: Above-median gross savings were obtained by 23 (52%) ESCOs with no program experience, 14 (32%) organizations with 1 year of experience, and seven (16%) organizations with 2 years of experience. The adjusted likelihoods of achieving above-median gross savings were 23 (95% confidence interval, 8 to 37) and 48 (95% confidence interval, 24 to 68) percentage points higher for ESCOs with 1 or 2 years of program experience, respectively (versus none). The adjusted likelihood of achieving above-median gross savings was 1.7 (95% confidence interval, -3 to -1) percentage points lower with each additional affiliated dialysis facility. Adjusted mortality rates were lower for ESCOs located in areas with higher socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller ESCOs, organizations with more experience in the CEC Initiative, and those located in more affluent areas performed better under the CEC Initiative.


Assuntos
Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Medicare/organização & administração , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Diálise Renal , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/economia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Medicare/economia , Características da Vizinhança , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/economia , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Classe Social , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
6.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 32(10): 2613-2621, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34599037

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ongoing changes to reimbursement of United States dialysis care may increase the risk of dialysis facility closures. Closures may be particularly detrimental to the health of patients receiving dialysis, who are medically complex and clinically tenuous. METHODS: We used two separate analytic strategies-one using facility-based matching and the other using propensity score matching-to compare health outcomes of patients receiving in-center hemodialysis at United States facilities that closed with outcomes of similar patients who were unaffected. We used negative binomial and Cox regression models to estimate associations of facility closure with hospitalization and mortality in the subsequent 180 days. RESULTS: We identified 8386 patients affected by 521 facility closures from January 2001 through April 2014. In the facility-matched model, closures were associated with 9% higher rates of hospitalization (relative rate ratio [RR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.03 to 1.16), yielding an absolute annual rate difference of 1.69 hospital days per patient-year (95% CI, 0.45 to 2.93). Similarly, in a propensity-matched model, closures were associated with 7% higher rates of hospitalization (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.13; P=0.04), yielding an absolute rate difference of 1.08 hospital days per year (95% CI, 0.04 to 2.12). Closures were associated with nonsignificant increases in mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.18; P=0.05 for the facility-matched comparison; HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.17; P=0.08 for the propensity-matched comparison). CONCLUSIONS: Patients affected by dialysis facility closures experienced increased rates of hospitalization in the subsequent 180 days and may be at increased risk of death. This highlights the need for effective policies that continue to mitigate risk of facility closures.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal , Idoso , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Pontuação de Propensão , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo , Diálise Renal/economia , Estados Unidos
7.
Value Health ; 24(11): 1592-1602, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34711359

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Policy makers have suggested increasing peritoneal dialysis (PD) would improve end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) outcomes and reduce Medicare spending compared with hemodialysis (HD). We compared mortality, hospitalizations, and Medicare spending between PD and HD among uninsured adults with incident ESKD. METHODS: Using an instrumental variable design, we exploited a natural experiment encouraging PD among the uninsured. Uninsured patients usually receive Medicare at dialysis month 4. For those initiating PD, Medicare covers the first 3 dialysis months, including predialysis services in the calendar month when dialysis started. Starting dialysis later in a calendar month increases predialysis coverage that is essential for PD catheter placements. The policy encourages PD incrementally when ESKD develops later in the month. Dialysis start day appears to be unrelated to patient characteristics and effectively "randomizes patients" to dialysis modality, mitigating selection bias. RESULTS: Starting dialysis later in the month was associated with an increased PD uptake: every week later in the month was associated with an absolute increase of 0.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6%-0.9%) at dialysis day 1 and 0.5% (95% CI 0.3%-0.7%) at dialysis month 12. We observed no significant absolute difference between PD and HD for 12-month mortality (-0.9%, 95% CI -3.3% to 0.8%), hospitalizations during months 7 to 12 (-0.05, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.07), and Medicare spending during months 7 to 12 (-$702, 95% CI -$4004 to $2909). CONCLUSIONS: In an instrumental variable analysis, PD did not result in improved outcomes or lower costs than HD.


Assuntos
Custos e Análise de Custo , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Diálise Peritoneal/economia , Diálise Renal/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Formulação de Políticas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
Ren Fail ; 43(1): 1259-1265, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34465266

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Twice-weekly hemodialysis (HD) could be regarded as an important part of incremental hemodialysis, volume status of this treatment model remains to be elucidated. METHODS: Patients undergoing regular twice-weekly or thrice-weekly hemodialysis in our unit on June 2015 were enrolled into the cohort study with an average of 2.02 years follow-up. Volume status of the subjects was evaluated by clinical characteristics, plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and bioimpedance assessments with body composition monitor (BCM). Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to compare patient survival between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with patients on thrice-weekly HD, twice-weekly HD patients had significantly higher log-transformed BNP levels (2.54 ± 0.41 vs. 2.33 ± 0.49 pg/ml, p = 0.010). Overhydration (OH) and the ratio of overhydration to extracellular water (OH/ECW) in twice-weekly HD group were significantly higher than that of thrice-weekly HD (OH, 2.54 ± 1.42 vs. 1.88 ± 1.46, p = 0.033; OH/ECW, 0.17 ± 0.07 vs. 0.12 ± 0.08, p = 0.015). However, subgroup analysis of patients within 6 years HD vintage indicated that the two groups had similar hydration status. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that log-transformed BNP levels, serum albumin and diabetes status were predictors of mortality in hemodialysis patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that patients with BNP levels higher than 500 pg/ml had significantly worse survival compared with those with lower BNP levels (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Twice-weekly hemodialysis patients had worse volume status than that of thrice-weekly HD patients especially for those with long-term dialysis vintage, BNP level was a powerful predictor of mortality in HD patients.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico/sangue , Diálise Renal/economia , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Idoso , Composição Corporal , China , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/sangue , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Albumina Sérica , Análise de Sobrevida
9.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 32(6): 1444-1453, 2021 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33833076

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Reports from around the world have indicated a fatality rate of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the range of 20%-30% among patients with ESKD. Population-level effects of COVID-19 on patients with ESKD in the United States are uncertain. METHODS: We identified patients with ESKD from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data during epidemiologic weeks 3-27 of 2017-2020 and corresponding weeks of 2017-2019, stratifying them by kidney replacement therapy. Outcomes comprised hospitalization for COVID-19, all-cause death, and hospitalization for reasons other than COVID-19. We estimated adjusted relative rates (ARRs) of death and non-COVID-19 hospitalization during epidemiologic weeks 13-27 of 2020 (March 22 to July 4) versus corresponding weeks in 2017-2019. RESULTS: Among patients on dialysis, the rate of COVID-19 hospitalization peaked between March 22 and April 25 2020. Non-Hispanic Black race and Hispanic ethnicity associated with higher rates of COVID-19 hospitalization, whereas peritoneal dialysis was associated with lower rates. During weeks 13-27, ARRs of death in 2020 versus 2017-2019 were 1.17 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.16 to 1.19) and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.24 to 1.36) among patients undergoing dialysis or with a functioning transplant, respectively. Excess mortality was higher among non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients. Among patients on dialysis, the rate of non-COVID-19 hospitalization during weeks 13-27 in 2020 was 17% lower versus hospitalization rates for corresponding weeks in 2017-2019. CONCLUSIONS: During the first half of 2020, the clinical outcomes of patients with ESKD were greatly affected by COVID-19, and racial and ethnic disparities were apparent. These findings should be considered in prioritizing administration of COVID-19 vaccination.


Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/etnologia , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/provisão & distribuição , Causas de Morte , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/etnologia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Transplante de Rim , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/etnologia , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Triagem , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
11.
Blood Purif ; 50(4-5): 662-666, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33626546

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is underutilized in many parts of the world despite pro-PD health policies. The physical and cognitive demands of PD means that over half of eligible patients require some form of assistance. As such, many countries now offer assisted PD (aPD) programs to help patients start or stay on PD as opposed to in-center hemodialysis (HD). In order to evaluate the potential scope of aPD, it is important to review the outcomes and cost considerations of aPD. SUMMARY: We reviewed available data from different countries and regions for health outcomes between aPD and in-center HD, with a focus on quality of life (QoL), mortality, hospitalization, and technique survival. We also evaluated studies discussing the overall costs of delivering aPD, including training, operating costs, and indirect costs and compared these to in-center HD costs for the same regions. Key Messages: aPD patients are older and more frail than either self-care PD patients and many in-center HD patients. We found no evidence for any difference in QoL, mortality, or hospitalization between aPD and in-center HD after adjustment for these differences. There is some evidence for an association between nurse assistance and improved technique survival as compared to family assistance or self-care PD. Despite increased cost of providing assistance in PD, it is still significantly less expensive than in-center HD in Western Europe and Canada.


Assuntos
Diálise Peritoneal , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Diálise Peritoneal/economia , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Diálise Peritoneal/mortalidade , Qualidade de Vida
13.
Transpl Int ; 34(4): 612-621, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33545741

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed the landscape of kidney transplantation in the United States and worldwide. In addition to adversely impacting allograft and patient survival in postkidney transplant recipients, the current pandemic has affected all aspects of transplant care, including transplant referrals and listing, organ donation rates, organ procurement and shipping, and waitlist mortality. Critical decisions were made during this period by transplant centers and individual transplant physicians taking into consideration patient safety and resource utilization. As countries have begun administering the COVID vaccines, new and important considerations pertinent to our transplant population have arisen. This comprehensive review focuses on the impact of COVID-19 on kidney transplantation rates, mortality, policy decisions, and the clinical management of transplanted patients infected with COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Política de Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/tendências , Assistência Perioperatória/tendências , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/tendências , Listas de Espera/mortalidade , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Transplante de Rim/mortalidade , Pandemias , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/organização & administração , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 74: 11-20, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33508455

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the United States, many low-income patients initiating hemodialysis are uninsured before qualifying for Medicare. Inadequate access to predialysis care may delay their arteriovenous (AV) access creation and increase tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) use. The 2014 Affordable Care Act expanded eligibility for Medicaid among low-income adults, but not every state adopted this measure. We evaluated whether Medicaid expansion was associated with decreased TDC use for hemodialysis initiation. METHODS: We queried the United States Vascular Quality Initiative state-level database for non-Medicare patients undergoing initial AV access creation from 2011 to 2018. We evaluated associations of receiving initial AV access in states that expanded Medicaid with concurrent TDC use, survival, and insurance coverage. RESULTS: Data were available for patients in 31 states: 19 states expanded Medicaid from January 2014 to February 2015. Among 8462 patients in the postexpansion period from March 2015 to December 2018, 58% were in Medicaid expansion states. Patients in Medicaid expansion states less often had concurrent TDCs (40% vs. 48%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, Medicaid expansion was independently associated with fewer TDCs (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8, P < 0.001). Three-year survival was similar between patients in Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states (84.7% vs. 85.2%, P = 0.053). Multivariable cox-regression confirmed the finding (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.1, P = 0.482). In difference-in-differences analysis, Medicaid expansion was associated with a 9.2-percentage point increase in Medicaid coverage (95% CI 2.7-15.8, P = 0.009). Hispanic patients exhibited a 30.1-percentage point increase in any insurance coverage (95% CI 0.3-59.9, P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in Medicaid expansion states were less likely to have TDCs during initial AV access creation, suggesting earlier predialysis care. Hispanic patients benefited from increased insurance coverage. Expanding insurance options for the underserved may improve quality metrics and cost-savings for hemodialysis patients.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cobertura do Seguro , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Medicaid , Diálise Renal/métodos , Adulto , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Diálise Renal/instrumentação , Governo Estadual , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
15.
Ther Apher Dial ; 25(6): 908-916, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33497039

RESUMO

The impact of the newly discovered severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causing coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) in hemodialysis patients remains poorly characterized. Some hemodialysis techniques reduce systemic inflammation but their impact on COVID-19 has not been addressed. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate factors associated with mortality in COVID-19 hemodialysis patients, including the impact of reducing interleukin-6 using a cytokine adsorbent filter. This is a prospective single-center study including 16 hemodialysis patients with COVID-19. All were dialyzed using a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) filter. Interleukin-6 levels were obtained before and after the first admission hemodialysis session and at 1 week. Baseline comorbidities, laboratory values, chest X-ray, and treatments were recorded and compared between survivors and non-survivors. Out of 16 patients (13 males, mean age 72 ± 15 years), 4 (25%) died. Factors associated with mortality were dialysis vintage (P = 0.01), chest X-ray infiltrates (P = 0.032), serum C-reactive protein (P = 0.05), and lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.02) at 1 week, oxygen therapy requirement (P = 0.02) and anticoagulation (P < 0.01). At admission, non-survivors had higher predialysis and postdialysis interleukin-6 levels (P = 0.02 for both) and did not present the reduction of interleukin-6 levels during the dialysis session with PMMA filter that was observed in survivors (survivors vs. non-survivors: 25.0 [17.5-53.2]% vs. -2.8 [-109.4-12.8]% reduction, P = 0.04). A positive balance of interleukin-6 during the admission dialysis was associated with mortality (P = 0.008). In conclusion, in hemodialysis COVID-19 patients, a positive interleukin-6 balance during the admission hemodialysis session was associated with higher mortality.


Assuntos
COVID-19/sangue , COVID-19/mortalidade , Interleucina-6/sangue , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/sangue , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Pediatr Transplant ; 25(2): e13867, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33058452

RESUMO

After 2 decades as a low-cost transplant centre in India, our rates of kidney transplantation are low compared to the burden of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We performed this study to identify possible barriers inhibiting paediatric kidney transplant and to assess the outcomes of paediatric ESKD. A retrospective chart review of ESKD patients (2013 - 2018) at a tertiary paediatric nephrology centre was conducted. Medical/non-medical barriers to transplant were noted. Patient outcomes were classified as "continued treatment," "lost to follow-up (LTFU)" or "died." Of 155 ESKD patients (monthly income 218 USD [146, 365], 94% self-pay), only 30 (19%) were transplanted (28 living donor). Sixty-five (42%) were LTFU, 19 (12%) died, and 71 (46%) continued treatment. LTFU/death was associated with greater travel distance (300 km [60, 400] vs 110 km [20, 250] km, P < .0001) and lower monthly income (145 USD [101, 290] vs 290 USD [159, 681], P < .0001). Among those who continued treatment, 41 proceeded to transplant evaluation of whom 13 had no living donor and remained waitlisted for 27 months (15, 30). The remainder (n = 30) did not proceed to transplant due to unresolved medical issues (n = 10) or a lack of parental interest in pursuing transplant (n = 20). Barriers to transplantation in low-resource setting begin in ESKD. LTFU resulted in withdrawal of care and was associated with low socioeconomic status. Among those who continued treatment, transplant rates were higher but medical challenges and negative attitudes towards transplant and organ donation occurred.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Seguimentos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/psicologia , Transplante de Rim/economia , Transplante de Rim/psicologia , Perda de Seguimento , Masculino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Curr Vasc Pharmacol ; 19(1): 4-11, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32242783

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), arterial stiffness is considered as a powerful predictor of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. However, the relevance of aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) as a prognostic biomarker for CV risk estimation is not yet fully clear. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of Medline/PubMed database from inception through August 21, 2019 to identify observational cohort studies conducted in ESKD patients and exploring the association of PWV with CV events and mortality. RESULTS: Whereas "historical" cohort studies showed aortic PWV to be associated with higher risk of CV and all-cause mortality, recent studies failed to reproduce the independent predictive value of aortic PWV in older ESKD patients. Studies using state-of-the-art prognostic tests showed that the addition of aortic PWV to standard clinical risk scores could only modestly improve CV risk reclassification. Studies associating improvement in PWV in response to blood pressure (BP)-lowering with improvement in survival cannot demonstrate direct cause-and-effect associations due to their observational design and absence of accurate methodology to assess the BP burden. CONCLUSION: Despite the strong pathophysiological relevance of arterial stiffness as a mediator of CV disease in ESKD, the assessment of aortic PWV for CV risk stratification in this population appears to be of limited value. Whether aortic PWV assessment is valuable in guiding CV risk factor management and whether such a therapeutic approach is translated into improvement in clinical outcomes, is an issue of clinical relevance that warrants investigation in properly-designed randomized trials.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Rigidez Vascular , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/fisiopatologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco
18.
Transplantation ; 105(2): 404-412, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32265414

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nationwide studies on the effects of wealth inequality on kidney transplantation are rare, particularly in a country with an expanded National Health Insurance Service and in Asian countries. METHODS: In this nationwide, population-based cohort study, we reviewed the national claims database of Korea in which details of nationwide health insurance are provided. From 2007 to 2015, 9 annual cohorts of end-stage renal disease patients were included. The annual financial statuses were collected and stratified into 5 subgroups in each year: the aided group in which insurance fee was waived and the 4 other groups divided by quartiles of their medical insurance fee. Time trends of incidence proportion of kidney transplantation among end-stage renal disease patients in each year were initially assessed. The risk of graft failure, both including death-censored graft failure and death with a functioning graft, was analyzed as a prognostic outcome within the transplant recipients. RESULTS: Significant disparity in the accessibility of kidney transplantation was present, and it was further widening, particularly from 2009 in which the National Health Insurance Service started to cover desensitized kidney transplantation. Desensitized or preemptive transplantation was less common in the poorest group who were more frequently receiving transplantation after 5 years of dialysis in the latter years. The prognosis of kidney transplantation was significantly worse in the poorer people, and this disparity also worsened during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Prominent disparity regarding accessibility to and prognosis of kidney transplantation was observed in Korea according to wealth inequality, and this disparity was worsening.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/economia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Renda , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
19.
Med Care ; 59(2): 155-162, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33234917

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients to have lower or equivalent mortality to patients who receive in-center hemodialysis (HD). Medicare's 2011 bundled dialysis prospective payment system encouraged expansion of home-based PD with unclear impacts on patient outcomes. This paper revisits the comparative risk of mortality between HD and PD among patients with incident end-stage kidney disease initiating dialysis in 2006-2013. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing 2-year all-cause mortality among patients with incident end-stage kidney disease initiating dialysis via HD and PD in 2006-2013, using data from the US Renal Data System and Medicare. Analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards models fit with inverse probability of treatment weighting that adjusted for measured patient demographic and clinical characteristics and dialysis market characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 449,652 patients starting dialysis between 2006 and 2013, the rate of PD use in the first 90 days increased from 9.3% of incident patients in 2006 to 14.2% in 2013. Crude 2-year mortality was 27.6% for patients dialyzing via HD and 16.7% for patients on PD. In adjusted models, there was no evidence of mortality differences between PD and HD before and after bundled payment (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.04; P=0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Overall mortality for HD and PD use was similar and mortality differences between modalities did not change before versus after the 2011 Medicare dialysis bundled payment, suggesting that increased use of home-based PD did not adversely impact patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Peritoneal/mortalidade , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Masculino , Medicare/organização & administração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Peritoneal/normas , Diálise Peritoneal/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Diálise Renal/normas , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
20.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(11): e2023663, 2020 11 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33136135

RESUMO

Importance: While several studies have demonstrated the benefit of enrollment in chronic condition special needs plans (C-SNPs) for other chronic diseases (eg, diabetes), there is no evaluation of the association of C-SNPs with outcomes among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Objective: To examine whether and to what degree C-SNP enrollment was associated with improved clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with ESKD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study included 2718 patients who were newly enrolled in an ESKD C-SNP between January 1, 2013, and September 30, 2017, and receiving dialysis from DaVita Kidney Care. Patients were followed up until death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (ie, December 31, 2018). Enrollees in C-SNP were matched via multiple clinical and demographic characteristics with 2 different control populations, as follows: (1) those in the same facilities (n = 2545) or (2) those in similar counties (n = 1986). Patients enrolled in CareMore C-SNPs (n = 206) were excluded from the study. Data analysis was conducted June to December 2019. Exposures: Standard ESKD care with dialysis plus access to an integrated care team who worked with the patient and the dialysis team, comprehensive health assessments done by the integrated care team, and access to select benefits (such as vision and dental care) as a C-SNP enrollee. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospitalizations, mortality, laboratory values indicative of metabolic control, and Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item (KDQOL-36) survey scores. Results: The 2545 C-SNP enrollees in the facility-matched analysis had a mean (SD) age of 57.2 (12.9) years, and included 968 (38.0%) women, 1328 (52.2%) Hispanic individuals, and 553 (21.7%) African American individuals. The 1986 C-SNP enrollees in the county-matched analysis had a mean (SD) age of 57.8 (12.2) years, with 705 (35.5%) women, 1085 (54.6%) Hispanic individuals, and 472 (23.8%) African American individuals. Compared with patients not enrolled in C-SNP, enrollees had lower hospitalization rates, with incidence rate ratios of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.97; P = .006) in the facility-matched analysis and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.70-0.83; P < .001) in the county-matched analysis. Compared with patients not enrolled in C-SNP, enrollees had decreased mortality risk in the same facilities (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68-0.88; P < .001) and in the same counties (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.88; P < .001). No significant differences were observed between C-SNP enrollees and matched patients in metabolic laboratory values or KDQOL-36 survey scores. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found a positive association of C-SNP enrollment with lower rates of hospitalization and mortality. The findings suggest that the additional services and benefits C-SNPs provide may improve outcomes compared with standard of care for patients with ESKD.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Medicare Part C/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA